Alexander Shvartsman (l.) plays against Wouter Sosef during Hoogeveen Open 2023. Photograph: Zainal Palmans
My good draughts friend
Ben Provoost (we have known each other for years) approached me to
make a contribution for draughts platform Damkunst. He asked me to
analyse my best game from 2023. I was happy to do so, and after a
while I chose to discuss my game against Peter Van der Stap. This
duel took place in a tournament in Baarn in June 2023, where I won
all seven games.
Against Van der Stap, I can boast of a good
score. Of the four games we had played until then, I only had to
concede one point. Still, our mutual games never went easy for me.
Van der Stap is a solid player, who likes to play strategically and
stick to his outlined course. Tactically, he is less strong and he
does not always calculate deep enough either.
Because we have
crossed paths before, I knew that he is not a player who is out to
exchange pieces – even when he is against a strong opponent. So Van
der Stap is a pleasant player to have opposite you.
My strategy
in the game I will discuss was, as usual, to try to get complicated
play on the board and thus get my opponent into trouble. For
instance, I try to do that by offering the opponent many choices.
One reason to analyse my game against Van der Stap is that this
duel is characterised by a lot of calculation. Also, typical of the
game are the various interesting psychological moments. Sometimes you
have to calculate fifteen to twenty (or deeper) and it is also very
important to estimate what your opponent is going to play. I will go
into all these moments and explain what I saw and thought and what my
opponent did and did not calculate.
It was my pleasure to analyse
this beautiful game, and I hope you will enjoy my report of it.
This game took place in the 4th round. Why I chose this opening against Van der Stap is not easy to say. Intuition probably played a role, but another reason is more of a practical nature: I know this opening quite well. So I don't have to spend much time on the opening moves, so I can put all my energy into the interesting middle game that arises after this. The flip side is that my opponent can also play relatively fast.
2.31-26 11-16 3.38-32!White continues to play convinced! Most of my opponents didn't even do 2.31-26 or continued with 3.37-32 and so on.
7-11I don't really like the forced variants that can arise after 3...18-22.
4.37-31 19-23 5.28x19 14x23 6.31-27 23-28 7.32x23 18x38 8.43x32 10-14 9.41-37The right wing lock is a fact. Now black has to make a choice.
12-18!?Black has to decide right now which development he prefers. The most commonly played standard variant is
The development chosen by black comes from Vadim Virny. At the time of the Soviet Union, he won many nice games in this opening.
The opening is over. On the board is a principle position. Black has an economic right wing lock, with no piece on 2. But is it also good? A lot depends on whom the white player is! On the one hand, black does not need to develop any more pieces on his right flank. On the other hand, without a piece on 2 or 7, black's position is not so flexible; the formation 7/12/18, needed to exchange piece 27, can no longer be put in position.
17.34-30?After this passive move, black's plan works! It was better to keep piece 34 in place and move to square 28 or 29 on the next move.
15-20?!The standard reaction, but a few moves later I understood that I had already made a mistake. Practically speaking, it was better not to lose an important tempo and continue with
However, all these variants do not matter that much, because there was no chance that white would have decided on 19.27-22!?
This is probably the most important moment of the game. Here I invested a lot of time in choosing a plan. If you have played the variants I give in the coming moves, you can answer the most frequently asked question from amateurs to grandmasters: „How many moves can you calculate ahead during the game?" I usually answer, „About 15 to 20 moves." Using this game, you can check whether my answer is correct...
24-29!?After long calculations, I decided on a very risky plan. I did so because the position becomes too clear after the alternatives. So I don't always play the best move, but take my opponent's capabilities into account in my choices. I hoped my opponent would not see the main variant, and the course of the game proved me right.
After a few minutes of thinking, white decides to exchange black's outpost. To be honest, I expected this answer...
Both players now play a series of logical moves.
24.30-25 20-24 25.47-42 4-10 26.41-36 10-15 27.38-33I was satisfied with the situation on the board. In my opinion, black has the initiative (which may be incorrect?). Indeed, I have free play on the left flank and on the other flank white has to consider the idea 17-22 and 24-29 and so on. However, a new plan needs to be made.
14-20!?Black tries to keep his opponent from controlling the important square 34.
31.28-22!Simple and strong. In such a game type, black should always have his answer ready for this standard attack. And I had that...
15-20!After a forced variant, the situation has changed completely. On the board is now a 9x9 position. The white outpost on 22 is enough protected, so black has no real advantage. However, white does still need to make some good moves...
37.45-40 9-14 38.40-34So far, there was no trouble for the white player.
41.33-29?This is Van der Stap's first but not last mistake.
A good exchange! Simple and strong. I smell blood now and start playing with renewed energy. The piece on 29 hinders the white game, and black tries to exploit this weakness to the maximum.
43.38-32 12-18 44.42-38 16-21! 45.38-33 18-23! 46.29x18 13x22Of course, this 7x7 position is still a draw, but thanks to the tempo advantage (+8), black exerts some pressure on the opponent.
47.34-29?Much better than the game move or 47.47-42 is 33-29. Now the situation becomes dangerous for white.
The time for concrete calculations now has come for black. Here I have to evaluate a few alternatives.
19-24Both players are directing for a clash, which could be dangerous for white. But... black has to move.
22-27 55.33-29?A mistake that could have been decisive.
A big mistake.
After a couple of sacrifices, a 5x2 endgame remains. The black pieces are very uncomfortable − all in the centre. During the game, I had the feeling that black cannot win anymore, and strong draughts programmes confirmed that feeling afterwards. But. I'm still trying to find problems for my opponent...
24-30 61.13-9 30-35 62.9-4 35-40Now comes the decisive moment in this 4x2 endgame.
64.31-18?White has lost an important tempo and is now without a chance, because he can't successfully attack any black piece.
65.18-13 44-49 66.13-30Other attacks are repelled as follows:
On the way to king, black's pieces support each other...
67.30-19 32-38 68.19-23White gives up.